Optimizing The Utilization Of Village Funds Through The Quadruple Helix Approach: A Literature Review

Authors

  • Lukman Efendi Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics & Business, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Yogyakarta https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8862-0076
  • Dendy Pramana Putra Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics & Business, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Yogyakarta
  • Adiwidya Muhammad Sofwan Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics & Business, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29103/e-mabis.v24i2.1062

Keywords:

village fund, optimizing, implementation, quadruple helix

Abstract

Village funds have become one of the alternative solutions in alleviating rural poverty in several countries, including Indonesia. The aims of this study is to identify implementations in the use of  village funds in Indonesia as a form of  village fiscal decentralization and to provide alternative strategies for optimizing village funds to achieve the goals of village fiscal decentralization. This research design is a literature review on the implementation of the utilization of village funds by using institutional databases to search for recommended journals. Based on the results of the literature review, there are several obstacles in implementing the use of  village funds including, (1) Utilization of  village funds still has weaknesses in the process of planning, organizing, implementing and controlling. In addition, in this process community participation and involvement is still not optimal, (2) There is no clear priority planning and program at the village level. Most of the village funds are used for infrastructure, so community empowerment programs tend to be sub-optimal (3) Most of the BUMDes are not in accordance with the goals and needs of the community and have not optimally empowered village communities. In its implementation, a four-actor collaboration model (quadruple helix) is recommended in this study.

References

Afonso, O., Monteiro, S., & Thompson, M. J. R. (2010). A growth model for the quadruple helix innovation theory. https://hdl.handle.net/1822/11703

Ash-Shidiqq, E. A., & Wibisono, H. (2018). Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Dana Desa sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Korupsi Pengelolaan Dana Desa. In Seminar Nasional Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang (Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 110-131). https://doi.org/10.37035/mua.v14i2.6613

Badan Kebijakan Fiskal (2018). Kajian Dana Desa: Analisis Empiris Badan Usaha Milik Desa, Kesempatan Kerja, Dan Infrastruktur Pada Seribu Desa Di Indonesia. https://fiskal.kemenkeu.go.id/files/berita-kajian/file/Kajian_dana_desa.pdf

Briando, B. (2017). Desentraliasi Fiskal Desa. Assets: Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Pendidikan, 6(2), 93-106. http://doi.org/10.25273/jap.v6i2.1178

Carayannis, E. G., & Rakhmatullin, R. (2014). The quadruple/quintuple innovation helixes and smart specialisation strategies for sustainable and inclusive growth in Europe and beyond. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5, 212-239. DOI 10.1007/s13132-014-0185-8.

Carayannis, E., & Campbell, D. (2009). Mode 3 and Quadruple Helix: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46 (3), 201-234. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374

Devkota, K. L. (2014). Impact of fiscal decentralization on economic growth in the districts of Nepal. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/icepp/12

Efendi, L., & Suharsih, S. (2023). Green Economy Based Agriculture Extension in Klaten Regency: A Literature Study on Evaluation and Strategy. Jurnal Social Economic of Agriculture, 12(1), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.26418/j.sea.v10i2.66230.

Hastuti, P. (2018). Desentralisasi fiskal dan stabilitas politik dalam kerangka pelaksanaan otonomi daerah di indonesia. Simposium Nasional Keuangan Negara, 1(1), 784-799.

https://jurnal.bppk.kemenkeu.go.id/snkn/article/view/293

Ivanova, I. (2014). Quadruple helix systems and symmetry: a step towards helix innovation system classification. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5, 357-369. doi:10.1007/s13132-014-0201-z

Khandker, S. R., & Koolwal, G. B. (2010). How infrastructure and financial institutions affect rural income and poverty: evidence from Bangladesh. The journal of development studies, 46(6), 1109-1137. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380903108330

Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The triple helix, quadruple helix,…, and an N-tuple of helices: explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy?. Journal of the knowledge economy, 3, 25-35.

Permatasari, P., Ilman, A. S., Tilt, C. A., Lestari, D., Islam, S., Tenrini, R. H., ... & Wardhana, I. W. (2021). The village fund program in Indonesia: Measuring the effectiveness and alignment to sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 13(21), 12294. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112294

Prastyanti, S., Subejo, M., & Sulhan, M. (2018). Poverty: A never ending homework in rural development. Academic Research International, 9(3), 124-134. http://www.savap.org.pk/journals/ARInt./Vol.9(3)/ARInt.2018(9.3-15).pdf

Ramly, A. R., Wahyuddin, W., Mursyida, J., & Mawardati, M. (2018). The implementation of village fund policy in improving economy of village society. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 6(3), 459-478. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v6i3.184

Rivan, A., & Maksum, I. R. (2019). Penerapan Sistem Keuangan Desa (siskeudes) dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Desa. Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), 9(2), 92-100. https://doi.org/10.31289/jap.v9i2.2487

Saragi, N. B., Muluk, M. K., & Sentanu, I. G. E. P. S. (2021). Indonesia’s Village Fund Program: Does It Contribute to Poverty Reduction?. Jurnal Bina Praja: Journal of Home Affairs Governance, 13(1), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.21787/jpb.13.2021.65-80

Schneider, A. (2003). Who gets what from whom?: the impact of decentralisation on tax capacity and pro-poor policy. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/bitstream/handle/20.500.12413/3970/Wp179.pdf

Soesilowati, E. (2017). Model for empowering farmers at dry land through quadruple helix approach. Journal of Arts and Humanities, 6(4), 01-09. https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v6i4.1131

Stansel, D. (2005). Local decentralization and local economic growth: A cross-sectional examination of US metropolitan areas. Journal of Urban Economics, 57(1), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2004.08.002

Suriadi, A., Mahalli, K., Achmad, N., & Muda, I. (2015). The applicative model of the village owned enterprises (BUMDes) development in North Sumatera. http://repository.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/69230

Timotius, R. (2018). Revitalisasi Desa Dalam Konstelasi Desentralisasi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 48(2), 323-344. http://jhp.ui.ac.id/index.php/home/article/view/1666

Warsito, B. R., & Maerani, I. A. (2018). The Cause Of Corruption Crime On Village Funds And Investigations Process In The Purworejo. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 1(3), 635-642. http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v1i3.3348

Xie, D., Zou, H. F., & Davoodi, H. (1999). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in the United States. Journal of Urban economics, 45(2), 228-239. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1998.2095

Yushkov, A. (2015). Fiscal decentralization and regional economic growth: Theory, empirics, and the Russian experience. Russian Journal of Economics, 1(4), 404-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ruje.2016.02.004

Zhang, T., & Zou, H. F. (1998). Fiscal decentralization, public spending, and economic growth in China. Journal of public economics, 67(2), 221-240.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-272

Downloads

Published

2023-10-31

Issue

Section

Articles