Type of Performance Measurement System and Management Commitment

Authors

  • Fachruzzaman Fachruzzaman Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Bengkulu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29103/e-mabis.v22i2.694

Keywords:

Type of Performance Measurement System, Management Commitment, Regional Work Unit (SKPD)

Abstract

This study aims to categorize the performance measurement system and management commitment of Bengkulu regional apparatus, and obtain empirical evidence of the relationship between the performance measurement system and management commitment. This study uses a quantitative approach with a survey method. Primary data was collected using a questionnaire distributed to elements of leadership and staff involved in the planning, implementation and/or supervision process at the Regional Work Units (SKPD) in Bengkulu. The results show that the SKPD performance measurement system is categorized in the worst case with management commitment in the category of getting started but limited performance. Empirically, the performance measurement system has a relationship with management commitment.

References

Achyani, F., & Cahya, B. T. (2011). Analisis Aspek Rasional Dalam Penganggaran Publik Terhadap

Efektivitas Pengimplementasian Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja Pada Pemerintah Surakarta. Maksimum,

(2), 68. https://doi.org/10.26714/mki.1.2.2011.68-77

Babakus, E., Yavas, U., Karatepe, O. M., & Avci, T. (2003). The Effect of Management Commitment to

Service Quality on Employees ’ Affective and. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(3),

–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303253525

Bason, C. (2017). Leading Public Design: How Managers Engage with Design to Transform Public

Governance. In Copenhagen Business School. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t88xq5

Bouckaert, G. (1993). Measurement and Meaningful Management. Public Productivity & Management

Review, 17(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.2307/3381047

Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2008). Managing Performance International Comparisons. Routledge.

de Jong, M., van Beek, I., & Posthumus, R. (2013). Introducing accountable budgeting: lessons from a

decade of performance-based budgeting in the Netherlands. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 12(3), 1–34.

https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-12-5k455r12vs37

Fachruzzaman. (2010). The Impact of Performance Measurement System Type and Management

Awareness Toward Program and Financial Performance on Educational Office in Regencies.

Malaysia-Indonesia International Conference on Economics, Management and Accounting

(MIICEMA).

Hermawan, E. (2011). Analisis Penerapan Sistem Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja Di Lingkungan Rumah

Tangga Kepresidenan – Sekretariat Negara RI.

Højlund, S. (2014). Evaluation use in evaluation systems – the case of the European Commission.

Evaluation, 20(4), 428–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389014550562

Illahi, B. K., & Alia, M. I. (2017). Pertanggungjawaban Pengelolaan Keuangan Negara Melalui Kerja Sama

BPK dan KPK. Integritas, 3(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v3i2.102

Kouzmin, A., Löffler, E., Klages, H., & Korac-Kakabadse, N. (1999). Benchmarking and performance

measurement in public sectors. Towards learning for agency effectiveness. International Journal of

Public Sector Management, 12(2–3), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513559910263462

McGill, R. (2001). Performance budgeting. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 14(1),

–391. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137315304

Melkers, J. E., & Willoughby, K. G. (2001). Budgeters’ views of state performance-budgeting systems:

Distinctions across branches. Public Administration Review, 61(1), 54–64.

https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00005

Muliyadi. (2013). Evaluasi Konsistensi Perencanaan dan Penerapan Anggaran Kinerja pada Dinas

Kesehatan Kab. Kutai Timur. Jurnal Administrasi Reform, 1, No.1(1), 253–262. e-journal.unmul.ac.id

Nabila. (2014). Pelaksanaan Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja di Jawa Timur. Jejaring Administrasi Publik., 2,

Downloads

Published

2021-11-22

Issue

Vol. 22 No. 2 (2021): Volume 22, Nomor 2, Oktober 2021

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).