ANALYSIS OF THE POLITICAL MARKETING SUCCESS OF THE WINNING NATIONAL PARTY WITH LOCAL AFFILIATED PARTY IN ACEH

Authors

  • Wahyuddin Wahyuddin Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Malikussaleh
  • Fuadi Fuadi Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Malikussaleh
  • Falahuddin Falahuddin Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Malikussaleh
  • Hanif Hanif Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Malikussaleh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29103/e-mabis.v22i1.655

Keywords:

Political Marketing, Election Decision, Political Party.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the level of success of the political marketing of the victory of the national party with its affiliated local party in Aceh. The political marketing concept of product, promotion, price and place is used in this study. Primary data was obtained by using a questionnaire. The research locations are two districts in the province of Aceh, namely Bireuen Regency and Pidie Jaya  Regency, while sampling using Maximum Likelihood (ML) in the estimation model requires the use of a minimum sample size of 100. By setting the number of samples for each voter national parties and local party voters. The sample will be taken at convenience from each research location. The result of the study of the coefficient of determination (R2) is 0.269. This means that 26.9% changes in the dependent variable, namely the Decision to Choose a National Party, can be explained in the independent variables, namely Product, Promotion, Price, and Place. While the remaining 73.1% is explained by other variables outside the variables studied. This shows that the contribution of the independent variable has little impact on the dependent variable. While the results of the coefficient of determination of the Decision to Choose a Local Party is 0.672. This means that 67.2% changes in the dependent variable, namely the Decision to Choose a Local Party, can be explained in the independent variables, namely Product, Promotion, Price, and Place. While the remaining 32.8% is explained by other variables outside the variables studied. This shows that the contribution of the independent variable has an impact on the dependent variable.

References

Arep, Ishak, & Tanjung, H. (2003). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Universitas Trisakti.

Butler, P., & Collins, N. (1994). Political marketing: Structure and process. European Journal of Marketing.

Dermody, J., Hanmerâ€Lloyd, S., & Scullion, R. (2010). Young people and voting behaviour: alienated youth and (or) an interested and critical citizenry? European Journal of Marketing.

Firmanzah. (2007). Marketing Politik Antara Pemahaman dan Realitas. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Ghozali, I. (2013). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 21 Update PLS Regresi (Edisi 7). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponogoro.

Harris, P. (2001). To spin or not to spin, that is the question: The emergence of modern political marketing. The Marketing Review, 2(1), 35–53.

Lilleker, D. G. (2006). Key concepts in political communication. Sage.

Moloney, K., & Colmer, R. (2001). Does political PR enhance or trivialise democracy? The UK general election 2001 as contest between presentation and substance. Journal of Marketing Management, 17(9–10), 957–968.

Nursal, A. (2004). Political marketing: strategi memenangkan pemilu: sebuah pendekatan baru kampanye pemilihan DPR, DPD, Presiden. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

O’Shaughnessy, N. J. (1990). The phenomenon of political marketing. Springer.

Saper, C. B., Cano, G., & Scammell, T. E. (2005). Homeostatic, circadian, and emotional regulation of sleep. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 493(1), 92–98.

Sugiono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Alfabeta.

Surbakti, R. (1992). Memahami ilmu politik. Grasindo.

Wring, D. (1997). Reconciling marketing with political science: theories of political marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 13(7), 651–663.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-13